Skip to content

Contact us

    Talk to our Experts


    +1 920 303 0470
    info@smart-is.com 1302 S Main ST , Oshkosh , WI 54902-6518

    JDA/Blue Yonder Application Monitor

    By Saad Ahmad, Executive Vice President of Smart IS International

    Overview

    One thing that all large implementations have in common is the need for some tasks that need to be completed periodically. These may be tasks that are by design or due to some data corruption. We often are unable to get the fix from the vendor or the fix may require an upgrade which may not be feasible.

    In previous versions we had Schedule Agents that could do this. In new versions we have a more elaborate construct called jobs.


    Our Approach

     

    At Smart IS we employ a slightly more sophisticated approach to this problem. We implement a concept of an application monitor that detects abnormalities and fixes them. While it executes using the provided constructs of schedule agent or jobs — it provides a more abstract view of this problem and thus the overall solution is easier to manage.

    We view the problem of an application monitor as follows:

    • Detect the issues of a certain type. Return several rows where each row indicates the issue of this type. This can take the form of a MOCA command or a SQL statement.
    • For each of the rows returned from above execute MOCA code to fix that situation.
    • Optionally log in dlytrn
    • Optionally raise EMS alerts.
    • Provide a front-end so that advanced end users can manipulate these monitors or add new ones.
    • Run these as a single job so that overall job schedule is not adversely impacted.
    • Publish progress to the job monitoring framework developed by Smart IS

    Our Solution

    We define this monitor in a new table:

    The solution is in the form of a single MOCA command called “run ossi monitor” which is scheduled using MOCA jobs. We define this to execute every minute and to control individual jobs that we may want to run less frequently — we use “Time Since Last Run” concept. Users can maintain this information themselves using a simple front-end application:

    All WMS implementations have some of these jobs that are developed over time to handle typical issues. For example:

    • We often have orphan invmov records. We can detect such records and then delete them.
    • Sometimes we have pckmov records that do not have corresponding pckwrk records. We can detect the condition and kill such pckmov records
    • It is common to have situations where rescod is not cleared. We can detect the condition and run “deallocate resource location” for these locations.
    • It is often a requirement to reprocess downloads in EERR status.
    • We can create a monitor to detect some abnormal conditions and send an email to a set of users with results of the query. This solution is easier than creating an EMS alert since it does not require a roll-out process and the email can include detailed results.

    Conclusion

    Any sort of an application monitor is a common requirement in any large system and, JDA WMS is no exception. Above design, pattern can be implemented generally for any large system. It looks at the problem abstractly and provides a solution that is simple to implement, maintain, and manage.

    Originally published at saadwmsblog.blogspot.com.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Recent Stories

    View All
    Blog Feature Image
    ForgeViu: Visual Experiences for an Intent-Centric Enterprise
    Jun 12, 2026

    Technology has a habit of making us believe that every new breakthrough renders everything that came before it obsolete. When television became mainstream, many predicted the end of radio. When e-commerce emerged, some predicted the end of physical retail. When smartphones arrived, there were predictions that desktop computing would become irrelevant. Reality is usually more

    Read More
    Beyond the Crawl: A Coding Agent for Proprietary Programming Languages
    May 17, 2026

    General-purpose coding models perform well on languages that are well-represented on the public internet. They fail predictably on proprietary or domain-specific languages: hallucinated identifiers, wrong call shapes, and confident reproduction of deprecated patterns. MOCA, the scripting language inside Blue Yonder’s Warehouse Management System, is one of those failure cases, the entire ecosystem (grammar, command catalog,

    Read More
    The Generalist Manifesto: Why “Broad Intelligence + Skill” Is the Future of AI
    May 08, 2026

    For the past couple of years, we’ve seen a massive push toward Specialized LLMs. The argument seems intuitive: if you need legal expertise, use a legal model. If you need medical expertise, use a medical model. Why rely on a “general” model when you can have one trained specifically for the task at hand? In

    Read More
    Safety by Ignorance vs Safety by Understanding: What the Claude–DoD Debate Is Really About
    Apr 03, 2026

    There is a growing debate in AI governance that is often framed as a dispute over “safeguards,” “alignment,” or “responsible AI.” A recent flashpoint involves models developed by Anthropic (notably Claude) and the U.S. Department of Defense, but the disagreement is deeper than any single vendor or contract. At its core, the debate is not

    Read More
    From Chat to Capability: Operationalizing Enterprise AI Intents
    Apr 02, 2026

    In earlier posts, I argued two related ideas: This post builds directly on those ideas and takes the next logical step. If intent is the real abstraction — and if enterprises need repeatable, governed intelligence — then the obvious question is: Where does intent actually live, and how does it execute? The Missing Layer: Intent

    Read More
    Enterprise Cognitive Intelligence, Without the Complexity
    Feb 17, 2026

      In our previous post, we showed how our MCP framework removes the friction from exposing system capabilities to AI. MCP solves access. Cognition requires meaning. Because enterprises don’t think in systems.They think in business concepts. The Limits of System-Level Intelligence Most MCP servers today expose a single system — ERP, WMS, OMS, planning engines —

    Read More
    From APIs to Intelligence: How Our MCP Framework Makes Any System AI-Ready
    Feb 17, 2026

    Everyone wants to “add AI” to their systems — but few succeed. Not because AI models aren’t powerful — they are. But because exposing enterprise systems to AI is still too hard. So for most teams, the friction is simply too high. A Useful Analogy: AI as a Researcher Think of AI as a researcher. At

    Read More
    F
    From System Silos to System Intelligence: The AI Shift Enterprises Cannot Afford to Ignore
    Dec 10, 2025

    Enterprises today operate in an environment where systems multiply, data sits fragmented, and real-time decisions depend on information scattered across platforms. The divide between organizations’ need for instant, secure, conversational access to enterprise intelligence and their reliance on siloed screens, complicated integrations, and manual reporting processes is increasing each year.   According to a survey report

    Read More
    Why Traditional Deployment Playbooks No Longer Keep Up with Modern Warehouses
    Oct 30, 2025

    Modern warehouses are evolving faster than the deployment practices that support them. What was once a predictable, linear, and manual deployment cycle has turned into a complex, high-stakes process that no longer fits the pace of operations. Traditional deployment playbooks were designed for slower systems with fewer moving parts. Today’s warehouses operate across multiple sites,

    Read More
    The Hidden Cost of Screen Development in Warehouse Reporting and the Solution
    The Hidden Cost of Screen Development in Warehouse Reporting and the Solution
    Oct 16, 2025

    Reporting sits at the core of every warehouse operation. It is the lens through which leaders make decisions, monitor performance, and anticipate challenges. Yet, behind the charts and dashboards lies a process that is often far more complex and costly than it should be. Screen development in warehouse reporting has become a silent drain on

    Read More