Skip to content

Contact us

    Talk to our Experts


    +1 920 303 0470
    info@smart-is.com 1302 S Main ST , Oshkosh , WI 54902-6518

    Will My BY System Handle the Load?

    Overview

     

    Stress Testing, the production system, is an important part of go-live readiness for new installs and upgrades. You want to be able to simulate the stress on the system so, that the system can be tuned properly before going live.

    Smart IS’s Stress Tester

     

    Smart IS has created a solution for JDA/Blue Yonder that simulates the load for the system by creating virtual pickers and receivers. These agents run from a client machine and run the MOCA commands that simulate user actions. The solution spaces out the system interactions randomly to simulate the real-world environment.

    Concepts

     

    Profile: You can create several profiles for the stress tester. When we run the solution, we run a specific profile.

    Tasks and Users: We have two types of clients — tasks and users. Tasks are used to stimulate automated processes that constantly run as a client to create work for users. These are similar to Blue Yonder tasks and jobs. Users correspond to actual users. We create users on the fly based on a template user ID.

    Meta-Data

     

    The meta-data for runs is stored in policies. The meta-data is abstract so, it does not take a long time to setup:

    • Modify the template picking and receiving commands based on specific business processes
    • Modify the commands that create work for the pickers and receivers
    • Define a template user ID
    • Define a number of users for each job code, e.g. how many pickers, and receivers, etc.
    • Run it
    • Analyze the results. Basically you are looking for the difference between min/max times. A high variance over a long period implies that stress is not being managed very well

    Use Case

     

    • From Smart IS MOCA Client, launch stress tester (Note that the free version of Smart IS MOCA Client is not licensed for this module):

    First open a tab for the connection, then launch the external application
    • You can maintain the meta-data from here or by going to the respective policies:
    General Setup
    Maintain users
    Maintain tasks
    • Go to the “Run” tab and press Run: This launches the stress tester.

    Each dot in the middle section represents a type of user. When it is doing something, it turns green. The grids are showing what it is doing at a given time.
    • Press “Run” again to stop the test.
    • Go to the “Report” Tab to see the results.

    The results are also kept in a few database tables.

    Conclusion

    As you can see from the results, this information can be very useful. A large difference between minimum and maximum may imply that the system faces contention as the number of users grows. This may offer opportunity to tune the system before it is placed in production.

    If you need more information about this solution, contact me at saad.ahmad@smart-is.com.

    Originally published at saadwmsblog.blogspot.com.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Recent Stories

    View All
    Blog Feature Image
    ForgeViu: Visual Experiences for an Intent-Centric Enterprise
    Jun 12, 2026

    Technology has a habit of making us believe that every new breakthrough renders everything that came before it obsolete. When television became mainstream, many predicted the end of radio. When e-commerce emerged, some predicted the end of physical retail. When smartphones arrived, there were predictions that desktop computing would become irrelevant. Reality is usually more

    Read More
    Beyond the Crawl: A Coding Agent for Proprietary Programming Languages
    May 17, 2026

    General-purpose coding models perform well on languages that are well-represented on the public internet. They fail predictably on proprietary or domain-specific languages: hallucinated identifiers, wrong call shapes, and confident reproduction of deprecated patterns. MOCA, the scripting language inside Blue Yonder’s Warehouse Management System, is one of those failure cases, the entire ecosystem (grammar, command catalog,

    Read More
    The Generalist Manifesto: Why “Broad Intelligence + Skill” Is the Future of AI
    May 08, 2026

    For the past couple of years, we’ve seen a massive push toward Specialized LLMs. The argument seems intuitive: if you need legal expertise, use a legal model. If you need medical expertise, use a medical model. Why rely on a “general” model when you can have one trained specifically for the task at hand? In

    Read More
    Safety by Ignorance vs Safety by Understanding: What the Claude–DoD Debate Is Really About
    Apr 03, 2026

    There is a growing debate in AI governance that is often framed as a dispute over “safeguards,” “alignment,” or “responsible AI.” A recent flashpoint involves models developed by Anthropic (notably Claude) and the U.S. Department of Defense, but the disagreement is deeper than any single vendor or contract. At its core, the debate is not

    Read More
    From Chat to Capability: Operationalizing Enterprise AI Intents
    Apr 02, 2026

    In earlier posts, I argued two related ideas: This post builds directly on those ideas and takes the next logical step. If intent is the real abstraction — and if enterprises need repeatable, governed intelligence — then the obvious question is: Where does intent actually live, and how does it execute? The Missing Layer: Intent

    Read More
    Enterprise Cognitive Intelligence, Without the Complexity
    Feb 17, 2026

      In our previous post, we showed how our MCP framework removes the friction from exposing system capabilities to AI. MCP solves access. Cognition requires meaning. Because enterprises don’t think in systems.They think in business concepts. The Limits of System-Level Intelligence Most MCP servers today expose a single system — ERP, WMS, OMS, planning engines —

    Read More
    From APIs to Intelligence: How Our MCP Framework Makes Any System AI-Ready
    Feb 17, 2026

    Everyone wants to “add AI” to their systems — but few succeed. Not because AI models aren’t powerful — they are. But because exposing enterprise systems to AI is still too hard. So for most teams, the friction is simply too high. A Useful Analogy: AI as a Researcher Think of AI as a researcher. At

    Read More
    F
    From System Silos to System Intelligence: The AI Shift Enterprises Cannot Afford to Ignore
    Dec 10, 2025

    Enterprises today operate in an environment where systems multiply, data sits fragmented, and real-time decisions depend on information scattered across platforms. The divide between organizations’ need for instant, secure, conversational access to enterprise intelligence and their reliance on siloed screens, complicated integrations, and manual reporting processes is increasing each year.   According to a survey report

    Read More
    Why Traditional Deployment Playbooks No Longer Keep Up with Modern Warehouses
    Oct 30, 2025

    Modern warehouses are evolving faster than the deployment practices that support them. What was once a predictable, linear, and manual deployment cycle has turned into a complex, high-stakes process that no longer fits the pace of operations. Traditional deployment playbooks were designed for slower systems with fewer moving parts. Today’s warehouses operate across multiple sites,

    Read More
    The Hidden Cost of Screen Development in Warehouse Reporting and the Solution
    The Hidden Cost of Screen Development in Warehouse Reporting and the Solution
    Oct 16, 2025

    Reporting sits at the core of every warehouse operation. It is the lens through which leaders make decisions, monitor performance, and anticipate challenges. Yet, behind the charts and dashboards lies a process that is often far more complex and costly than it should be. Screen development in warehouse reporting has become a silent drain on

    Read More